Volume 2, Issue 2 (Spring 2016)                   Infect Epidemiol Med 2016, 2(2): 1-16 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Masoudi M, Jahantigh H, Jokar P. Land Use Planning using a Quantitative model and Geographic Information System (GIS) in Sistan Region, Iran. Infect Epidemiol Med. 2016; 2 (2) :1-16
URL: http://journalsystem.ir/article-1-59-en.html
1- Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Shiraz University, Iran , masoudi@shirazu.ac.ir
2- Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Shiraz University, Iran
Abstract:   (45 Views)
Land use planning is a science that determines the type of land use through studying the ecological character of the land as well as its socio-economic structure. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the land use and natural resources for future sustainable land planning using GIS as a tool. So, In this study, a systematic method known as the Makhdoom Model was used for the analysis of maps in relation to the ecological and resources of the studied area. First, ecological capability maps of different land uses including forest, agriculture, range management, environmental conservation, aquaculture, ecotourism and development of village, urban and industry were developed by overlaying geographical maps in GIS for the Township. The final step of this study was the prioritization of land uses considering the ecological and socio-economic characteristics of the study area using a quantitative model. The results of the evaluation indicated that the maximum area of proposed uses is 28.69% that is related to conservation showing this land use has high potential in study area. Also, minimum area of proposed uses is related to dry farming.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2017/08/28 | Accepted: 2017/08/28 | Published: 2017/08/28

1. Abu Hammad, A. and Tumeizi, A. Land Degradation: Socioeconomic and Environmental Causes and Consequences in the Eastern Mediterranean. Land Degrad. Develop. 2010; 23: 216-226.
2. Amiri, M.J., Salman Mahini, A., Jalali, S.GH., Hosseini, S.M. And Azari Dehkordi, F. A Comparison of Maps Overlay Systemic Method and Boolean-Fuzzy Logic in the Ecological Capability Evaluation of No.33 and 34 Watershed Forests in Northern Iran. Environ Sci. 2010; 7: 109-124. (In Persian).
3. Asadifard, E. Landuse Planning in Firuzabad Township Based on Modifying Method of Current Model Using GIS. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, 2015.
4. Babaie Kafaky, S., Mataji, A. and Ahmadi Sani, N. Ecological Capability Assessment for Multiple-Use in Forest Areas Using GIS-Based Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach. Am J Environ Sci. 2009; 5: 714-721.
5. Baja, S., Chapman, D.M. and Dragovich, D. A conceptual model for defining and assessing land management units using a Fuzzy modeling approach in GIS Environment. Environ Manage. 2006; 29: 647-661.
6. Biswas, A. and Baran, P. B. Application of fuzzy goal programming technique to land use planning in agricultural system. Omega. 2005; 33: 391– 398.
7. Bocco, G., Mendoza, M. and Velazquez, A. Remote sensing and GIS-based regional geomorphological Mapping-a tool for land use planning in developing countries. Geomorphology. 2001; 39: 211-219.
8. Bojo´rquez-Tapia, L., Di´Az-Mondrago, ´ N.S. and Ezcurra, E. GIS-based approach for participatory decision making and land suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Info Sci. 2001; 15: 129-151.
9. Burrough, P.A., MacMallin, R.A. and van Deursen, W. Fuzzy classification methods for determining land suitability from soil profile observations and topography. J Soil Sci.1992; 43: 193-210.
10. Cools, N., De Pauw, E. and Deckers, J. Towards an integration of conventional land evaluation methods and farmers’ soil suitability assessment: a case study in northwestern Syria. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003; 95: 327-342.
11. Davidson, D.A., Theocharopoulos, S.P. and Bloksma, R.J. A land evaluation project in Greece using GIS and based on Boolean and Fuzzy set methodologies. Int J Geogr Inf Syst. 1994; 8: 369-384.
12. Espejel, I., Fischer, D.W., Hinojosa, A., GarcõÂa, C. and Leyva, C. Land-use planning for the Guadalupe Valley, Baja California, Mexico. Landscape Urban Plan. 1999; 45: 219-232.
13. Feizizadeh, B., and Blaschke, T. Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: A multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2013;56:1-23.
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). A framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin 32, Soil resources development and conservation service land and water development division, Rome. 1976; 87p.
15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Guidelines for Land Use Planning. Soil Resources, Management and Conservation Service, Rome.1993; 96p.
16. Gandasasmita, K. and Sakamoto, K. Practical application of a land resources information system for agricultural landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007; 79:38–52.
17. Jafari, R. and Bakhshandehmehr, L. Quantitative mapping and assessment of environmentally sensitive areas to desertification in central Iran. Land Degrad. Develop. 2013; DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2227.
18. Jokar, P. Mapping of land use planning based on modification and quantitative method of current model. (A case study: Jahrom Township). M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, 2015.
19. Jozi, S.A. Evaluation of Ecological Capability using Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation Method (SMCE) (Case study: Implementation of Indoor Recreation in Varjin Protected Area-Iran). IJESD. 2010; 1: 273-277.
20. Makhdoom, M. Fundamental of Land Use Planning. Tehran University Press, Tehran. 2001; 289 p. (In Persian).
21. Marani Barzani, M. and Khairulmaini, O.S. Desertification risk mapping of the Zayandeh Rood Basin in Iran. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013; 122:1269–1282.
22. Masoudi, M. Risk assessment and remedial measures of land degradation in parts of Southern Iran. Lambert Academic Publishing (LAP), Germany. 2010.
23. Masoudi, M. and Jokar, P. Suggestion the Proposed Model of EMOLUP, with New Approach in Land Use Planning (Step Two: Prioritizing for Different Land Uses). Environmental Studies. 2016; 14(2): under publication (In Persian).
24. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA). Land use and Environment, Report on the state of the Environment in Kenya. A publication of the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Kenya. 2004; 176p.
25. Nouri, J. and Sharifipour, R. Ecological Capability Evaluation of Rural Development by Means of GIS. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2004; 1: 81-90.
26. Oyinloye, M. and Kufoniyi, O. Application of IKONOS Satellite Images in Monitoring of Urban Land use Change in Ikeja, GRA, Lagos, Nigeria. IJESI. 2013; 2:1-10.
27. Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F. GIS Assessment of Munich’s Urban Forest Structure for Urban Planning. J Arboric. 2000; 26: 133-141.
28. Peel, D. and Lloyd, M. Neo-traditional planning. Towards a new ethos for land use planning? Land Use Policy. 2007; 24: 396–403.
29. Pierce, S.M., Cowling, R.M., Knight, A.T., Lombard, A.T., Rouget, M. and Wolf, T. Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: Interpretation for implementation. Biol Conserv. 2005; 125: 441-458.
30. Prato, T. Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty. Land Use Policy. 2007; 24: 165-174.
31. Razaghi, S. Assessment and comparison of land use planning in Sepidan region using models of Makhdom, MCE and EMOLUP. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, 2016.
32. Swanson, E. Geographic information system (GIS) information enhanced land use planning. Michigan Center for Geographic Information Department of Information Technology. 2003.
33. Santra, A. Role of Remote Sensing in Forest Carbon Sequestration with Special Emphasis on Fossil Fuel Combustion. In: Kumar, R. (ed.) Fossil Fuels: Sources, Environmental Concerns and Waste Management Practices. New York, Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2013.
34. Yousefi-Sahzabi, A., Sasaki, K., Djamaluddin, I., Yousefi, H., & Sugai, Y.. GIS modeling of CO2 emission sources and storage possibilities. Energy Procedia. 2011; 4: 2831–2838.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Online Academic Intelligent services. All rightes reserved.